Privacy International

The 2003 UK Big Brother Awards


Latest News
New Documents
Activities
Issues
Resources
Conferences
About PI

London, 25 March 2003

On March 25, 2002, Privacy International announced the winners of the 5th Annual UK "Big Brother" awards to the government and private sector organisations that have done the most to invade personal privacy in Britain.

Four "Big Brother" awards were presented to the individuals, organizations, and departments which have done most to invade personal privacy. A "lifetime menace" award was given to an invader with a long history of attacking privacy. A new award: "Dog Poo on a Stick" was also given.

"Winston" awards were also given to individuals and organisations which have made an outstanding contribution to the protection of privacy, as well as to people who have been victims of privacy invasion.

Privacy International's Director, Simon Davies, said the award winners reflected the "prolonged and vicious" attack on the right to privacy. He said privacy invasion in Britain has become "a vast industry that threatens the rights of everyone in Britain".

" The judges were overwhelmed this year with a vast number of malodorous nominations. Many politicians and companies have since the September 11th attacks jumped onto the security bandwagon without any justification".

He added "The UK Government is attempting to systematically extinguish the right to privacy. Their plans should be resisted by everyone who cares about freedom".

 

2003 Winners and Runners Up

 

WORST PUBLIC SERVANT

KEN LIVINGSTONE. David Blunkett was consistently nominated for this category, but his transgressions against personal privacy have been so grave that the judges also unanimously promoted him to the Lifetime Menace (see below). He competed with Ken Livingston (nominated because of his obsession with travel and transport surveillance), and the government's secretive "Interception of Communications" Commissioner, Sir Swinton Thomas.

MOST INVASIVE COMPANY

CAPITA.  This category was a contest between Capita (the company behind many of the government's most controversial surveillance and data management schemes), Argos, which (among other transgressions) has participated in a customer thumb-printing scheme, and the credit reference giant Experian, which won the company category award in 1999. Capita won because of its long standing involvement in a vast range of government projects, which it often has botched.

MOST APPALLING PROJECT

PIU DATA SHARING REPORT. The government's discredited Entitlement Card proposal went head-to-head with the "Data Sharing" scheme shepherded by the government's Performance & Innovation Unit. The judges felt the Entitlement card idea was just too stupid, woolly and nebulous to win. The other short-listed nomination was Electronic Voting.

MOST HEINOUS GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION

ASSOCIATION OF CHIEF POLICE OFFICERS (ACPO)  This was a fiercely fought contest between our old favourite the Home Office, and two newcomers: the Lord Chancellor's Department and the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). ACPO won because it has recently gone beyond merely being a patsy for bad government policy, and has taken a more active role in developing and promoting invasive schemes.

LIFETIME MENACE

TONY BLAIR  This was a fiercely contested category, but Tony Blair was always slightly ahead of the field because of his active involvement in the government's attack on civil liberties. David Blunkett was close on his heels. Capita becomes the second company ever to make it to the Lifetime Menace category.

NEW AWARD: DOG POO ON A STICK.

Each year the judges consider a nomination that is so odious and contemptible that they are reluctant to agree to spending scarce money on an expensive gold award for the villain. These occasions deserve an appropriate award, and so this year we give the first "Dog Poo On A Stick" prize. It goes to David Blunkett.

Privacy International also gave a "Dishonourable Mention" to the Office of the Information Commissioner, and accused the office of complacency and dereliction of duty. "Because of its consistent failure to adequately promote and protect the principles of privacy the Office is rapidly becoming part of the problem" said Mr Davies.

Winston Awards

On a more upbeat and encouraging note, the judges each year give a number of Winston Awards to individuals and organisations who have made an outstanding contribution to the protection of rights and privacy. This year those winners are:

  •  Posthumously, to the greatly respected Dr Roger Needham
  •  Teri Dowty, Joint national coordinator, Childrens Rights Alliance for England and Wales
  •  Marion Chester, Legal Director, Association of Community Health Councils of England and Wales
  •  STAND
  •  Richard Norton-Taylor and Stuart Millar of the Guardian
  •  Undercurrents

Privacy International offers its best wishes and gratitude to these champions of privacy. Their contribution has made a huge difference to the defence of rights in the UK.

 

 


The awards was judged by a panel of experts, comprising lawyers, academics, consultants, journalists and civil rights activists.

 News Stories

 The Organising Body and Sponsors

 
Privacy International (PI) was formed in 1990 as a non-government watchdog on surveillance and privacy invasion. The organisation has campaigned throughout the world on dozens of issues ranging from identity cards and encryption policy, to workplace surveillance and military intelligence. PI's membership includes IT specialists, lawyers, judges and journalists from forty countries.