Can a Covid-19 face mask protect you from facial recognition technology too?
Can the masks that we now wear to protect each other from Covid-19 also protect our anonymity, preventing the latest mass facial recognition systems from identifying us? The short answer is 'no, most probably not'.
- It is virtually impossible to be certain whether a mask is totally or partially effective against all, some, or indeed any facial recognition systems.
- We designed and produced a mask as a symbol of resistance against the growing use of mass facial recognition.
- You can get one of our specially designed masks by donating £20 to PI, or setting up a monthly gift of £2.
Our relationship with ‘public space’ is being redefined, not just by a global pandemic, but also by a new era of biometric surveillance technologies. Biometric mass surveillance enables companies and authorities to track us based on unique personal data and identify us whenever, wherever we go.
The increasing use of facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies – on our streets, in train stations, at protests, at sports matches and even in our global ‘town square’, Facebook – means that our freedom to be anonymous in public spaces, our freedom to just be, really does face an existential threat.
Mass facial recognition risks our collective futures and shapes us into fear-driven societies of suspicion.
This got folks at EDRi and Privacy International brainstorming. Could the masks that we now wear to protect each other from Coronavirus also protect our anonymity, preventing the latest mass facial recognition systems from identifying us?
A COVID-19 facemask that tricks facial recognition? Let’s try.
At first, it seemed an easy task. After all, a face mask covers most of your face already.
However, we already know that facial recognition systems are remarkably sophisticated, and can identify people (or misidentify people) with relatively little ‘face data’. In fact, while we were working on this project, new revelations showed: a normal face mask doesn’t help you ‘evade’ facial recognition.
Given that anti-surveillance clothing and make-up has had some success in confusing facial recognition systems in the past, we thought that it would be worth experimenting with a similar approach with a face mask pattern.
In looking for the right pattern design, we sought the advice of two researchers / artists with experience in tricking facial recognition algorithms: Adam Harvey and Tijmen Schep.
More difficult than it seems, the tech is too creepy.
And that’s where it got complicated. Here are just some of the challenges we encountered in our journey:
- Every facial recognition system works in a different way. This means that a design that might ‘fool’ one system, might not fool another.
- Most facial recognition algorithms as opaque black boxes. The lack of transparency in the use of facial recognition makes it difficult to understand what is being used, how and where. As Adam put it “There is really no such thing as a mask that blocks ‘face recognition’ but rather a mask that blocks, for example, a ResNet-50 CNN model that was trained on VGG Face2 dataset.”
- Masks have a small surface area. A pattern that might work on an item like a t-shirt might not be effective in confusing FR when used on a small item like a mask.
- Stopping face detection, let alone recognition. We tried to create a pattern that would confuse the tech in such a way that it wouldn’t even perceive a face, let alone be able to recognise it. This might be through using a pattern made up of simple black and white geometric forms. However, face detection technologies are so good these days, we soon realised that this approach is unlikely to fool them.
- Face detected. Stop recognition? So then we then considered an alternative approach. Instead of geomertic forms, what about using warped face-like features instead, perhaps using a mixture of natural and ‘unnatural’ colours, to mislead or at least lower the confidence of a match score? We were optimistic about this, but then we got stuck in the black box problem : we could only know of its effectiveness, by testing it across a vast range of currently opaque facial recognition technologies, which are constantly being updated and increasingly sophisticated.
What did we learn?
Here’s what we learnt from our exploration into stopping intrusive facial recognition technologies from detecting or recognising our face when wearing a face mask:
- It is virtually impossible to know whether even our most ‘educated guess’ would be totally effective, partially effective, or totally ineffective against all, some, or indeed any facial recognition systems.
- The small acts of resistance we might take against these powerful technologies are not a substitute for for structural, long-lasting solutions. Therefore...
- …People should not carry the burden of masking themselves to maintain their anonymity. Instead, governments must ensure unlawful biometric mass surveillance such as mass facial recognition is banned in our publicly accessible spaces.
Why did we produce the mask anyway?
The mask is a symbol of resistance against the growing use of mass facial recognition.
The solutions we ultimately need are not clever facial recognition-thwarting face masks. Instead, we need politicians and decision–makers to ensure there is strong regulation against biometric mass surveillance.
To get your specially designed face mask donate £20 to PI or set up a regular gift of £2 per month.