Search Taxonomy Terms

Two individuals applied to the European Court of Human Rights to challenge a UK tribunal’s refusal to investigate UK intelligence agencies’ interference with their right to privacy.

The applicants challenged the UK’s mass interception regime following PI’s campaign and support. As part of a friendly settlement reached by the parties in this case, the UK government admits that they violated the applicants’ rights to privacy and freedom of expression.

We, with over 40 other organisations, are asking the European Union to ban mass biometric surveillance. If you’re a European Union citizen, join us in signing our European Citizen’s Initiative.

If 1 million of us step up - we can force the European Commission to take on biometric mass surveillance properly

Privacy International, together with Liberty, challenges MI5's data-handling arrangements before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.

PI intervened in the case challenging the constitutionality of South African surveillance law.

Privacy International made a complaint challenging the export of surveillance software developed by a German company to Bahrain

After a complaint submitted by Privacy International, Gamma International UK was found in breach of OECD Guidelines

Privacy International submitted an intervention to the Korean Constitutional Court challenging provisions of the Telecommunications Business Act 

Privacy International intervened in a case before the European Court of Human Rights successfully challenging the unfettered use of surveillance measures as part of anti-terrorism legislation

Seven applicants complaints testing the scope of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal's prerogative to conduct investigations. Their legal action was a result of PI’s campaign and support.