Search Legal Cases
Increasingly, political parties, political campaigns and those who work for them tap into and exploit our data to seek to influence us. It is essential that legal safeguards are in place and enforced to challenge these practices.
From facial recognition to social media monitoring, from remote hacking to the use of mobile surveillance equipment called 'IMSI catchers', UK police forces are using an ever-expanding array of surveillance tools to spy on us as we go about our everyday lives.
Privacy International et al. v. FBI et al.: On 21 December 2018, Privacy International, together with the American Civil Liberties Union and the Civil Liberties & Transparency Clinic of the University at Buffalo School of Law, filed a lawsuit demanding U.S. federal law enforcement and immigration
PI est intervenue dans une affaire française contestant la conservation des données personnelles dans le cadre de la réglementation française en vigueur, devant une juridiction nationale puis devant la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne.
PI intervened in a French case challenging the retention of personal data under French law first at national level and then before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
After months of research, we filed complaints against seven of data broker companies: Acxiom, Criteo, Equifax, Experian, Oracle, Quantcast, and Tapad.
We must compel governments to promote and respect the highest data protection standards.
PI challenges police forces' refusal to disclose information on mobile phone surveillance.
It is time that these companies - which operate within the hidden data ecosystem - receive the attention and scrutiny they deserve. Our campaign to uncover this hidden data ecosystem began on 25 May 2018 the day the new EU data privacy law - GDPR - came into force. We will be using the law as a tool
Privacy International filed an intervention at the Colombian Constitutional court challenging the mass surveillance provisions contained in the Colombian Police Code.