Skip to main content
Get email updates
What We Do
Where we work
Privacy International Network
Two minute reads
State of Privacy Briefings
Submissions to the UN
Staff and Fellows
You are here
Surveillance companies: real responsibility goes beyond the letter of the law
Mass surveillance and classified patents
Foreign companies complicit in Bahrain's human rights violations
French Minister states opposition to surveillance technology exports
Skype, please act like the responsible global citizen you claim to be
British spyware used to target Bahraini activists
Privacy in constitutions: The data
The British government knows more about surveillance exports than it is letting on
Local police forces in US expanding use of drones
Committees on Arms Export Controls: UK government must make good on assurances to Privacy International
Privacy in the developing world: a global research agenda
Civil servant admits British police grabbing location data of thousands of innocent people
The National Pupil Database is not open data
Blanket exemption from FOIA for the 'British FBI'
How will the Communications Data Bill affect you?
The draft Communications Bill is a wasted opportunity
Why privacy is for everyone
APEC developments, March 2012
Round-up: Scrambling for Safety 2012
Myths, modifications and surveillance 'modernisation'
Every step you take, every move you make: The British government's new plans for mass surveillance
FAQ: The Communications Capabilities Development Programme
Mass surveillance statistics
Do surveillance companies care about human rights?
PI's trip to Asia
Why Twitter has taken the wrong fork in the road
Thoughts on Google's policy changes
Norway will not divest investment in $2 billion 'surveillance portfolio'
What does Twitter know about its users? #NOLOGS
Indian Parliamentary Committee trashes UID Bill